Cases 51 - 60 of 30,698
MACKALL v. BELL et al
as 2:2024cv00296
Defendant:
RICHARD STUART JOSEPH, KATHERINE SWEENLEY BELL, KATHRYN STUART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MACKALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODWIN v. GRAY et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DAVID GOODWIN
Defendant:
TONY GRAY and CLARA DEBOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
DEJAUNE L. ANDERSON and PRINCESS CALIFIA HATUN TUPAK BEY II
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GLENN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BECKWITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
TYLER BECKWITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PARR v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
TOMMY W. PARR
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRACE v. CALVART et al
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
O'SHUN UNTHA GRACE
Defendant:
JAMIE CALVART and BRIAN ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
