Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in South Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 25,018
Wazney v. Sumter County
as 3:2024cv03436
Plaintiff: Robert W Wazney
Defendant: Sumter County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Doll v. Stonebreaker
as 1:2024cv03430
Plaintiff: Bryon Doll
Defendant: Warden Donnie E. Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wright v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv03441
Petitioner: Robert Lee Wright
Respondent: South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brownfield v. Brownfield
as 9:2024cv03432
Petitioner: O'Livia C. Brownfield
Respondent: Brandon C. Brownfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. McMaster
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff: Phillip D. Newberry
Defendant: Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dextraze v. Mondules
as 9:2024cv03406
Plaintiff: Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant: Correctional Officer Mondules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mack v. Barnette et al
as 7:2024cv03401
Plaintiff: John Willie Mack, Jr
Defendant: Barry Joe Barnette, John David Burgess and Manuel J. Ortundo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dextraze v. Cribb et al
as 4:2024cv03407
Plaintiff: Kevin Richard Dextraze
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff Cribb, Deputy Sheriff Scott, Deputy Sheriff White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel v. Darlington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv03410
Petitioner: Steven Lewis Samuel and Steven Samuel,
Respondent: Darlington County Detention Center, Sheriff James Hudson and Warden Wadell Coe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felton v. USA
as 4:2024cv03409
Petitioner: Kimo Takarra Felton
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?