Cases 61 - 70 of 430
West v. Martin et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph West
Defendant:
Sean Martin, Cameron Shepherd and Lance Gaerte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNSER v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LEE UNSER
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Reagle et al
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Andrew Joseph West
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, D.J. Sigler and Jason Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION SERVICES, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. New Haven City of et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Walters
Defendant:
New Haven City of, Jacob Niese, Tim Schweitzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogle v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Vuyani Isaiah Ogle and Vuyani Ogle
Defendant:
Andrew Davis, Adam Butler, David Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PELISSIER v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00129
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS ANDREW PELISSIER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Sheriff et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Damien Andrews
Defendant:
Sheriff, Aramark and Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundberg v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lundberg
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Bradbury, Allmon and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
