Cases 61 - 70 of 1,227
Dugas v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
Damon Turner, Darrel Vannoy, Christopher Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dugas v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jermaine Dugas
Defendant:
Carl Smith, Darrel Vannoy, Marcus Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bell Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. LeBlanc
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Morgan
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Raman Singh, Sherwood Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Columbus Chris Williams
Respondent:
Donnie Bordelon and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owings v. Burris et al
as 2:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Owings
Defendant:
Williams J Burris, Colin Sims, Randy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act
Hippler v. Conn et al
as 2:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wade Hippler
Defendant:
Brad Conn, John Craft, Heather Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. USA
as 3:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
Eugene Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
