Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 30,544
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Petitioner: MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorado v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02098
Petitioner: Carlos Dorado
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Steed v. Lynch
as 5:2024ct03133
Plaintiff: Byron Steed and Byron Lynn Steed
Defendant: Sergeant Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blount v. USA
as 3:2024cv00504
Petitioner: Quivonte Blount
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCants v. Harrison et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Travus McCants
Defendant: Chum Harrison, FNU Woodard, FNU Nealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00443
Petitioner: RODNEY EDWARD WALL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GREEN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner: MICHAEL JUSTIN GREEN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMS v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00445
Plaintiff: JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant: USA and TEXAS, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Balfour v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: Craig Balfour
Defendant: David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff: Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant: Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?