Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 30,546
Balfour v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: Craig Balfour
Defendant: David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner: Ruben Fuller
Respondent: Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whitehurst v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024ct03136
Plaintiff: Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant: Timothy L. Lewis, Mashell L. Wilson and Sgt. D. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate
as 5:2024ct03137
Plaintiff: Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant: Lt. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00510
Petitioner: Zonta Tavarus Ellison
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant: CHUM HARRISON, FNU WOODARD, FNU NEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Russ et al
as 5:2024ct03085
Plaintiff: Andre C. Shelton
Defendant: Nicholas A. Russ, Dare County Detention Center, Marshall H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02099
Petitioner: Antwain Lamar Dennis
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rozelle v. USA
as 3:2024cv00508
Petitioner: Michael Todd Rozelle
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03134
Plaintiff: Harry Sharod James
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?