Cases 1 - 10 of 187
Casto v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Chad Casto
Defendant:
Deputy J. B. Thompson and Deputy L. Roush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cohen
Defendant:
United States of America, Eddie Anderson, Dr. Emery McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milliron v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
William B. Milliron
Respondent:
Miss Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sharp v. United States
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Sharp
Defendant:
Lt. C. Looney, Officer Specialist B. Jones, Correctional Officer Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ramirez-Bueno v. Looney et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Ramirez-Bueno
Defendant:
C. Looney, Johnson, Dinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Samuel B. Ford
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Samuel B. Ford
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crowder v. Bayless
as 3:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Danny B. Crowder, Jr.
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
