Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Van Etten v. Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
as 4:2024cv40066
Petitioner:
Gregory James Van Etten
Respondent:
Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11557
Defendant:
Orzon Rubio, Bristol County District Attorney's Office, Bristol County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Evans Emons Stroman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weiler v. The British Royal Navy
as 1:2023cv10154
Plaintiff:
Gregory Arthur Weiler, II
Defendant:
The British Royal Navy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weiler vs United States of America
as 1:2023cv10151
Plaintiff:
Gregory Arthur Weiler, II
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hillman et al
as 1:2021cv11704
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Judge Timothy S. Hillman, Judge Sidney Hanlon and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiler v. Kijakazi et al
as 1:2021cv11614
Plaintiff:
Gregory Weiler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Violette v. Fandryer et al
as 4:2021cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Fandryer and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Violette v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2020cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Violette v. Capetti et al
as 4:2020cv40048
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisions and Mr. Capetti
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
