Cases 1 - 10 of 1,727
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PETTICORD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
GLYNN PETTICORD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thomas, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
MARK PRICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
Dewayne Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Eugene Dawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
