Cases 1 - 10 of 24,964
Brooks v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv03511
Petitioner:
Emonte Brooks
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaillard v. Hill-Finklea Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv03496
Plaintiff:
Percy Devon Gaillard
Defendant:
Hill-Finklea Detention Center, Major Anthony Fyall, Cpt. Archie Beau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabata v. City of Hanahan et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Luxolo Tabata
Defendant:
City of Hanahan, Mildred Rowell and Private First Class Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Sullivan v. Cherokee County, et al
as 6:2024cv03423
Plaintiff:
David Farrell Sullivan
Defendant:
Cherokee County and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wright v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv03441
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Wright
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Spartanburg County et al
as 6:2024cv03449
Plaintiff:
Deandre L Fuller
Defendant:
Spartanburg County and Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Alston v. Beck et al
as 0:2024cv03433
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Judge Walton Henry Beck and County of York, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dawkins v. Newberry County et al
as 8:2024cv03435
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Dawkins
Defendant:
Newberry County and Fairfield County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Doll v. Stonebreaker
as 1:2024cv03430
Plaintiff:
Bryon Doll
Defendant:
Warden Donnie E. Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Breyan v. McCormick Courts
as 8:2024cv03428
Plaintiff:
Michael A Breyan
Defendant:
McCormick Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
