Stockholders Suits Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Joyce v. Amazon.com Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00617
Plaintiff: Sonny Joyce
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc, Andrew R Jassy, Jeffrey P Bezos and others
Petitioner: Jerry Hannah, Universal-Investment-Gesellschaft mbH, Universal-Investment-Luxembourg S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Andersen v. Corbat et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv08669
Defendant: Grace E Dailey, Ellen M Costello, Lew W Jacobs and others
Nominal Defendant: CitiGroup Inc.
Plaintiff: Dean Andersen
Lead Plaintiff: Employees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island and The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Meitav Dash Provident Funds and Pension Ltd., et al v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, et al
as 22-5013
Plaintiff / Appellant: MEITAV DASH PROVIDENT FUNDS AND PENSION LTD., GARY SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and CITY OF MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS AND POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT TRUST
Plaintiff: JACOB GOLDMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF PROVIDENCE
Defendant / Appellee: SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., THOMAS C. GENTILE, III, JOSE GARCIA and others
In Re: Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2020cv09438
Defendant: Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff: Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island, Dean Andersen and Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Nominal Defendant: Citigroup Inc.
Interested Party: Westchester Putnam Counties Heavy & Highway Laborers Local 60 Benefit Funds and Police & Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Lead Plaintiff: The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09937
Defendant: Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Plaintiff: The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Nominal Defendant: Citigroup Inc.
Lead Plaintiff: Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund v. Corbat et al
as 1:2020cv09977
Defendant: Alexander Wynaendts, James S. Turley, Grace E. Dailey and others
Nominal Defendant: Citigroup Inc.,
Plaintiff: Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund
Lead Plaintiff: Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and The Employee Retirement System of the City of Providence
Employees' Retirement System of the City of Providence v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00117
Plaintiff: Employees Retirement System of the City of Providence
Defendant: Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc., John Gilson, Thomas C Gentile, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mizel et al v. Unified Capital Partners 3 LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv10712
Defendant: Unified Asset Management. LLC and Unified Capital Partners 3 LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Consolidated Asset Funding 3 LP
Plaintiff: Provident Trust Group F/B/O Steven Mizel Roth IRA, Steven Mizel and Provident Trust Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Geotag Inc v. Allied Provident Insurance Inc
as 3:2012cv02267
Plaintiff: Geotag Inc
Defendant: Allied Provident Insurance Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Maloof v. BT Commercial Corporation, et al
as 08-3648
Intervenor / Appellee: MARK UHRICH, Plan Administrator of the Consolidated Estate of Level Propane Gases, Inc., et al., WHM EMPRISES, INC, OVER-FLO LOT, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: JEFFREY SCHWARTZ, BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM H. MALOOF
Defendant: ABN AMBRO HOLDING, N.V.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?