Cases 1 - 10 of 15
FITZMARK, LLC v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
FITZMARK, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT ROGERS and TRAFFIC TECH INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
REEVES v. GENESYS CLOUD SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2021cv02114
Plaintiff:
ROGER REEVES
Defendant:
GENESYS CLOUD SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
May et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Plaintiff:
Roger May and Julie May
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00112
Defendant:
CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC and ROGER CROWDER
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trahan v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01060
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Roger J. Trahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinnermon et al v. REV Recreation Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
Roger McKay and Donna Tinnermon
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re MDL-1700 FedEx Ground Package System Inc Employment Practices Litigation No II
as 3:2005md00527
Plaintiff:
Ed Rosa, Steve Hatton, Barry Whittemore and others
Defendant:
Albert Rettinger, Federal Express, All FedEx Ground Defendants and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Special Master:
Hon James Rosenbaum
Not Yet Classified:
Law Offices of George A. Barton and Palmer Freeman, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A. v. SWIERBUT et al
as 1:2017cv02869
Plaintiff:
BMO HARRIS BANK N.A.
Defendant:
SWERBS FINANCIAL, INC., SWERBS MOTORS, INC. and ROGER A SWIERBUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Russell v. DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Roger Russell
Defendant:
DRH Cambridge Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buckley et al v. Monaco RV LLC
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Buckley and Roger Buckley
Defendant:
Monaco RV LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
