Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Show-Me's Franchises, Inc. v. Sullivan
as 3:2013cv00409
Plaintiff:
Show-Me's Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Brad Sullivan
Counter_claimant:
Brad Sullivan
Counter_defendant:
Show-Me's Franchises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tibbits v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
as 6:2007cv01340
Plaintiff:
Brad E. Tibbits doing business as Dick's Harley Davidson Co.
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Great Harvest Franchising, Inc. v. Mullet et al
as 2:2007cv00025
Defendant:
Brad Mullet and Scott Carpenter
Plaintiff:
Great Harvest Franchishing, Inc., Great Harvest Franchishing, Inc. and Great Harvest Franchishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Massey, Inc. et al v. Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00741
Plaintiff:
Massey, Inc., Massey, Inc., Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc., Raving Brands, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc., Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc., Fusion Foods of Tennessee, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Dreesch, Steven Egan-Fowler, Brad Dunning and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Moe's Southwest Grill, LLC, Raving Brand Holdings, Inc., Raving Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bray et al v QFA Royalties
as 1:2006cv02528
Plaintiff:
Chris Bray, Sabine Bray, Training Pros Inc. and others
Defendant:
QFA Royalties LLC and QFA Royalties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
