Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.384 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv07507
Plaintiff: TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: 0.384 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENRIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
TRANCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE COMPANY, LLC v. 0.171 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv07506
Plaintiff: TRANCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE COMPANY, LLC
Defendant: 0.171 ACRES OF LAND IN THE TOWNSHIP OF UNION, HUNTERDON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF UNION, NEW JERSEY WATERS SUPPLY AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Board of County Commissioners of Otero County v. United States Department of Interior
as 2:2012cv00462
Petitioner: Board of County Commissioners of Otero County
Respondent: United States Department of Interior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 0.13 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conecuh County, State of Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00238
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 0.13 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conecuh County, State of Alabama, The Country Store, Charles M. Ward, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
United States of America v. 74.57 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conecuh County, Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00239
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 74.57 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conecuh County, Alabama, Sue S. Cramer, Stowers Timberlands, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
United States of America v. 55.12 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conech County, State of Alabama et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00237
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 55.12 Acres of Land, more or less, Located in Evergreen, Conech County, State of Alabama, William W. Ward , Bettye P. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258
KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company, The et al
as 2:2010cv02459
Plaintiff: KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. and K-Powernet, L.L.C.
Defendant: Kansas City Southern Railway Company, The , Cherokee County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners, Cherokee County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WASTEWATER ONE, LLC v. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2009cv00077
Plaintiff: WASTEWATER ONE, LLC
Defendant: CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CLARK COUNTY INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Real Property None
Texas Gas Transmission, LLC v. 18.08 acres +/- in Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 30 North, Range 4 West, Coahoma County, Mississippi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00240
Plaintiff: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC and Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant: 18.08 acres in Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 30 North, Range 4 West, Coahoma County, Mississippi and The Board of Levee Commissioners for the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv01161
Plaintiff: ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, INDIANA, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, INDIANA and FRANKLIN COUNTY AREA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?