Land Condemnation Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 57
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.25 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 1:2008cv00503
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1.25 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in CAMERON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, Tres D's Tierras, LLC, Lone Star National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.47 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2008cv00425
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 0.47 Acres of Land, More or Less, Paul Cordova, Luana Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2.21 Acres of Land et al
as 1:2008cv00324
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 2.21 Acres of Land, Nora DeLeon Ramirez and First National Bank at Brownsville
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1.61 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2008cv00327
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 1.61 Acres of Land, More or Less, Tres D's Tierras, LLC, Anthony DePonce and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.459 ACRE OF LAND, more or less, et al
as 1:2008cv00280
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 0.459 ACRE OF LAND, more or less,, Usvaldo Martinez, Usvaldo Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. 123.62 ACRES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00751
Plaintiff: ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and others
Defendant: 123.62 ACRES, WILLIAM HARVEY HEGARTY, CONSTANCE BOYD HEGARTY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority v. Easements and Rights-of-Way over 9.58 acres of land, more or less, in Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv00143
Plaintiff: United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America Upon The Relation And For The Use Of The Tennessee Valley Authority
Defendant: Easements and Rights-of-Way over 9.58 acres of land, more or less, in Lowndes County, Mississippi, Trimac Properties, L.P., Trustmark National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC v. E/2 SE/4, Section 13, Township 9 South, Range 9 East of the Indian Base and Meridian, Bryan County, State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00182
Plaintiff: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant: E/2 SE/4, Section 13, Township 9 South, Range 9 East of the Indian Base and Meridian, Bryan County, State of Oklahoma, Thomas D. Bonn, John E. Bonn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Real Property None
Transwestern Pipeline Company, v. 17.19 Acres of Property Locate, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-15991
Plaintiff - Appellant: TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: 17.19 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN MARICOPA COUNTY, more of less, AGUA FRIA INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OLATHE, a Kansas corporation and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ARIZONA and INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. 3.543 Acres of Real Property in Adams County, Colorado et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00657
Plaintiff: Colorado Interstate Gas Company and Colorado Interstate Gas Company
Defendant: 3.543 Acres of Real Property in Adams County, Colorado, Cordillera Corporation, Zions First National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?