Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re Delta Air Lines, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00786
Plaintiff:
Frankie Lomas, Roxanda Yancor, S. P. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Y. C., Maria L. Rivera, Jose Frausto and others
Petitioner:
Rosa Santiago, Adrian B. Alvarez, Ivania Urrutia and others
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc., Doe 1 and Does 2 through 50, inclusive; From member case number: 2:22-cv-01589 JAK (SKx)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
**ERROR - NOT USED**
as 3:2014cv01798
Plaintiff:
South Parcel of Puerto Rico, S.E., Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Javier Ramos-Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
South Parcel of Puerto Rico, S.E. v. Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority et al
as 3:2014cv01799
Plaintiff:
South Parcel of Puerto Rico, S.E.
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority , Javier Ramos-Hernandez , Miguel A. Torres-Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Michael Younessi v. Jon Secrist et al
as 8:2013cv01281
Defendant:
Does, Catherine Marie Frazier, Lasena Harvill and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Younessi
HB Park LLC v. Jon Secrist et al
as 8:2013cv01240
Defendant:
Does, Vincente Ekachai Ramos and Jon Secrist
Plaintiff:
HB Park LLC
GILBERT v. HEINE et al
as 2:2013cv04756
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN L. GILBERT
Defendant:
ELLEN HEINE, RUTHANN HUGHES, RICHARD HOLLER and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Betsy Ramos, F
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Rivera-Narvaez v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2011cv02167
Plaintiff:
Edgar Rivera-Narvaez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Antonio Ramos-Candelaria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adinolfe v. United Technologies Corporation
as 9:2010cv80840
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adinolfe, Jolynn Adinolfe, Regnier Alexis and others
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation doing business as Pratt & Whitney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
