Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lyke v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Nicolaas Lyke
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Popp v. Montana Rail Link
as 9:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link
Plaintiff:
Jacob Popp
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Grosklos v. York Railway Company et al
as 1:2012cv02088
Plaintiff:
Phillip C. Grosklos
Defendant:
York Railway Company, Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. and Rail Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Goldsberry v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
as 3:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Dennis Goldsberry
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation , Iowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad Corp. , Soo Line Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Smith v. Rail Link, Inc., et al
as 11-8011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGET SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
RAIL LINK, INC. and GENESSEE & WYOMING, INC.
Goldsberry v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation
as 1:2011cv00956
Plaintiff:
Dennis Goldsberry
Defendant:
Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation , Iowa Chicago and Eastern Railroad Corp. , Soo Line Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wolfe v. York Railway Company et al
as 1:2010cv01832
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Wolfe
Defendant:
York Railway Company, Rail Link, Inc. and Genessee & Wyoming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Smith v. Rail Link Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Bridget Smith
Defendant:
Rail Link Inc and Genesee and Wyoming Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Abromeit v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.
as 9:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Abromeit
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
William Fletcher v. Chicago Rail Link, et al
as 08-1609
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM R. FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
CHICAGO RAIL LINK
Defendant - Appellee:
AUTOMASTERS TIRE AND SERVICE CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
