Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Garner v. Quarter North Energy L L C
as 6:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Garner and Michael L Garner
Defendant:
Quarter North Energy, LLC and Quarter North Energy L L C
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
C&G Welding, Inc. v. Garner
as 2:2017cv03786
Plaintiff:
C&G Welding, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Garner
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Garner v. American Commercial Barge Line, LLC
as 3:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Anthnoy Lee Garner
Defendant:
American Commercial Barge Line, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Collins v. Diamond Services Corp
as 2:2016cv08067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Collins
Defendant:
Diamond Services Corporation
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Scheuermann & Jones, LLC
Intervenor_defendant:
Garner & Munoz, Clarence Collins and Diamond Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Garner v. HAL Antillen N.V. et al
as 2:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Garner
Defendant:
HAL Antillen N.V. , Holland America Line, Inc. and Holland America Line N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
3G Fishing Charters LLC, et al v. Kirby Inland Marine L.P. et al
as 3:2014cv00107
Defendant:
Kirby Inland Marine L.P. and Cleopatra Shipping Agency LTD
Plaintiff:
3G Fishing Charters LLC , Launch Waterfront Eatery LLC , Galveston Fishing Charter Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Garner et al v. Isaac et al
as 2:2011cv01492
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ross Garner and James S Garner, V
Defendant:
Daniel H Isaac, III and Daniel H Isaac, Jr
Thirdparty_defendant:
Marlin Quay Marina, John Doe and ABC Corporation
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Daniel H Isaac, Jr and Daniel H Isaac, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Garner v. Rigdon Marine Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv03598
Plaintiff:
Christopher Garner and Christopher Garner
Defendant:
Rigdon Marine Corporation and H. P. Specialized Drilling Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
