Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Pereira v. U.S. Bulk Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv06731
Plaintiff:
Daisy Pereira
Defendant:
U.S. Bulk Transport, Inc. , U.S. Bulk Transport IC, Inc. , Edward Hicks Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KARA v. SIMONSEN et al
as 3:2015cv04181
Plaintiff:
ANDREA KARA
Defendant:
MICHAEL SIMONSEN , ICES, LLC, ICES, BRAND ENERGY SERV and others
Cross_claimant:
MICHAEL SIMONSEN , BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC and BRAND ENGINEERING, LLC
Cross_defendant:
ABC COMPANIES 1-20, JAMES J. CLARKE, JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanchez et al v. Reddy Ice Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez and David Becerra
Defendant:
Reddy Ice Corporation and Clinton Lee Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raber v. Curry Ice & Coal of Carlinville, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv04196
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Raber
Defendant:
Curry Ice & Coal of Carlinville, Inc. , Herzog Q John, Tommy J Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz v. Ice Cream Treats, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Kristy Schultz
Defendant:
Ice Cream Treats, LLC, Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc., Edy's Ice Cream, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Williams et al v. Henderson et al
as 2:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams and Delane Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Henderson, Daniel Henderson, Curry Ice & Coal Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JENKINS v. IRIZARRY et al
as 1:2008cv00861
Plaintiff:
DOLORES A. JENKINS
Defendant:
CONNIE IRIZARRY and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
WRIGHT v. DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM INC et al
as 2:2007cv00257
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WRIGHT, JR and DENNIS WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
DREYER'S GRAND ICE CREAM INC and TIMOTHY ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
