Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Nicks v. Keck et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Carla Nicks
Defendant:
Brian Keck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
EISENBERG v. MCCULLEY et al
as 0:2015cv60091
Plaintiff:
CARLA EISENBERG
Defendant:
JIMMY LEE MCCULLEY and SMITHPORT FREIGHT, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. GREEN et al
as 5:2014cv07240
Plaintiff:
CARLA JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH GREEN, PATRICIA ROSENZWEIG and RONALD AHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss et al v. Goodfellow et al
as 1:2014cv09875
Plaintiff:
Barbara Moss and Jonathan Moss
Defendant:
Francis Goodfellow, Mark Lobel, Carla J. Lobel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Ingle et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv03868
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ingle , Carla Johnson and Clara Francis
Defendant:
Adam Johnson , Cara Elliott and K & C Limousine Service of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mv Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
HOLMES v. EVANS et al
as 2:2014cv01728
Plaintiff:
DENNIS HOLMES
Defendant:
CARLA EVANS , BRIAN EVANS and MARK BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Haney v. Headrick et al
as 3:2014cv00010
Defendant:
Alpha Boring Co., Inc., FCCI Insurance Company and Calvin L. Headrick, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Carla Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
RUBENSTEIN et al v. EVANS et al
as 2:2013cv06525
Plaintiff:
DEAN RUBENSTEIN , HEATHER RUBENSTEIN , NOAH SOKOLOFF and others
Defendant:
CARLA EVANS and BRIAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Conigliaro et al
as 1:2013cv03318
Plaintiff:
Ayanna Lawhorn Jones
Defendant:
Lane Elizabeth Conigliaro and Carla Lane Conigliaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols v. Landstar Ranger Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Carla Nichols
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger Inc , Landstar System Inc and James Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
