Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Al Zeiny v. USA, et al
as 18-15634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL ZEINY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Rossmann v. African American and Other Lesbians, ect. et al
as 1:2017cv09347
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
African American and Other Lesbians, ect., Barack Obama , Muriel Bowswer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zeiny v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2017cv07023
Plaintiff:
Al Zeiny
Defendant:
The United States of America and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rossmann v. Pompeo et al
as 3:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Michael Pompeo, Christopher Wray, Michael Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossmann v. Central Intelligence Agency Director et al
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossmann v. Sapin et al
as 8:2017cv02223
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Central Intelligence Agency, John Doe - 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARTA BREEZE TRANSPORTATION, WANDA DUNHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER vs CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, et al
as 5:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA RENA GARNER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MARTA BREEZE TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY et al
as 5:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, MARTA POLICE, FEDERAL TRANSIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARNER v. LYNCH et al
as 5:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA RENA GARNER
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, JOHN HORN, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
