Cases 31 - 40 of 127
Williams v. Crawley
as 4:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Ramona G Crawley
Plaintiff:
Eddie R Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Isaacks
as 4:2021cv00287
Defendant:
David B Isaacks
Plaintiff:
Eddie R Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Doe et al
as 6:2021cv03074
Defendant:
John Doe, Coinbase Global, Inc., Kasim Mahmood and others
Plaintiff:
Titus Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Bridgewater v. Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP et al
as 4:2020cv00723
Defendant:
Josh Williams, Wal-Mart Stores East I, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Donald Bridgewater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Deca Realty et al
as 4:2020cv01042
Defendant:
Joe Unknown, Deca Realty, Bedrock Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sharron M. Williams and Carolyn M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Mallinckrodt LLC. et al
as 4:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Beverly Scholfield, Jacqueline Newton, Jessica Baker and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT LLC., Cotter Corp. and Mallinckrodt LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camden County v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv02930
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Camden County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. NPC Quality Burgers, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00861
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Glen Williams
Defendant:
NPC Quality Burgers, Inc. d/b/a Wendy's and NPC Quality Burgers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams-Norris v. Target Corporation
as 4:2019cv02717
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Hazel Williams-Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Francois County v. Dannie E. Williams, M.D. et al
as 4:2019cv01722
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Caremark RX, LLC, Express Scripts Holding Company and others
Plaintiff:
St. Francois County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
