Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Manning v. Hardee's Food Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alvin Manning
Defendant:
Hardee's Food Systems, LLC, Hardee's Restaurants LLC, CKE Restaurants Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martin v. Lam
as 1:2019cv03264
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Defendant:
Kim Hoa Lam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Carroll County Sherriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv03265
Defendant:
Sheriff T. DeWees James, Jane Doe, et al and Carroll County Sherriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Danz et al
as 1:2019cv03223
Defendant:
Carroll County Health Services Corporation, David Bland, Erin Danz and others
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoon v. Thierolf et al
as 1:2019cv00884
Plaintiff:
E. Calhoon
Defendant:
Jacobson, Thierolf and Dickey P.C., Richard B. Thierolf and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patriot General Insurance Company v. Eason, Kennedy & Crawford et al
as 1:2017cv00994
Plaintiff:
Patriot General Insurance Company
Defendant:
Eason, Kennedy & Crawford, Richard B. Eason, Jr., Brennan, Harris & Rominger LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Harshman
as 1:2016cv01890
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Midge Harshman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. McGann
as 8:2016cv01609
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Terrence J. McGann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. CORE SECURITY SOLUTIONS,INC
as 1:2016cv00744
Defendant:
CORE SECURITY SOLUTIONS,INC
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. MARTIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00743
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. MARTIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
