Cases 1 - 10 of 136
Lee v. United Parcel Service
as 1:2024cv04316
Plaintiff:
Willie Marshall Lee
Defendant:
United Parcel Service doing business as UPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Johnson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Johnson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc., Wale Apparatus Co Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raj Patel v. United Parcel Services
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Jacobson v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01871
Plaintiff:
Carol Jacobson
Other:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
United Parcel Service General Services Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Byrne v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
John Byrne
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stephens v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephens
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patel v. The United Parcel Services
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel and Raj Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stephens v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06081
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephens
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Patel v. The United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
The Excellent The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
