Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Davenport v. Advocate Christ Medical Center et al
as 3:2016cv50256
Plaintiff:
Melisa J. Davenport
Defendant:
Advocate Christ Medical Center, Advocate Home Health Services, Thoratec Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Evans v. Den Hartog
as 5:2016cv05060
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Evans
Defendant:
Bryan Den Hartog
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. GGNSC Stanford LLC
as 5:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Evan Tucker
Defendant:
GGNSC Stanford LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frances Finley v. Richard Evans
as 15-3646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frances Morris Finley
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Parker Evans, MD
Evans et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2015cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jaida Evans and Luther Evans
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2015cv03034
Plaintiff:
Charles Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, Paul Hwan Chung, Ryan J Mauck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Evans v. Mauch
as 2:2015cv09100
Plaintiff:
Charles Evans
Defendant:
William D Mauch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2015cv01783
Defendant:
Lloy Anderson, Melissa Dworkin, Parkmed Physician, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Katrina Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Michele Simmons , Mary Schlenk , Carol Stockton and others
Defendant:
Skechers USA, Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kroll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03955
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kroll , Mary Kathleen Katchur , Kathy Donald and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Petitioner:
Martha Harp and Patsy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
