Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniels v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07736
Plaintiff:
Ramona Daniels
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d//b/a JF Labs, Inc., Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawrenceburg Community School Corporation v. JUUL Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv03436
Plaintiff:
Lawrenceburg Community School Corporation
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc. f/k/a PAX Labs, Inc., James Monsees, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Blankenship v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 1:2021op45021
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Hikma Labs Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Salina Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blankenship v. Indivior Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Hikma Labs Inc., Reckitt Benckister Healthcare (UK) Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Salina Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West Middlesex Area School District v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv06389
Defendant:
James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Adam Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
West Middlesex Area School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tharp v. Franck's Lab Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Bernice Tharp
Defendant:
Franck's Lab Inc , Paul W Franck RPh , Anthony James Campbell RPh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Triantos v. Utah Valley Dental Lab, Inc.
as 2:2008cv01547
Plaintiff:
Phillip Triantos, Phillip Triantos and Phillip Triantos
Defendant:
Utah Valley Dental Lab, Inc. and Utah Valley Dental Lab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Teed et al v. Repro Lab, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04097
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Teed and Kiyoko Teed
Defendant:
Repro Lab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Teed et al v. Repro Lab, Inc.
as 7:2007cv04097
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Teed and Kiyoko Teed
Defendant:
Repro Lab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
