Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Murray v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv01638
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sheree Murray
Cross_claimant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company , Georgia-Pacific LLC , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKinley v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Robert McKinley, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atlas Foundry Company, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2010cv05977
Plaintiff:
Luther Eugene Carter and Sonja C. Carter
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2010cv05977
Plaintiff:
Luther Eugene Carter and Sonja C. Carter
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
