Cases 11 - 20 of 51
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06881
Plaintiff:
NEAL EUGENE BAUMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41776
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS BAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84434
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS WAYNE BAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35993
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauman III v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2020cv01765
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Bauman III
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19269
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAUMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02182
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BAUMAN
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04376
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02957
Plaintiff:
WILSON OSPINA, DAVID HAUGHTON, JAOOD WALLACE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Powers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01972
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ospina, David Haughton, Jaood Wallace and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
