Cases 11 - 17 of 17
DURAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv30507
Plaintiff:
PEDRO S. DURAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARRAMANZANA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv91205
Plaintiff:
RODOLFO M. CARRAMANZANA and RODOLFO M. CARRAMANZANA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bartel et al v. A-C Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2009cv10017
Plaintiff:
Willard E. Bartel, Willard E. Bartel, David C. Peebles and others
Defendant:
A-C Product Liability Trust, Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Alaska Steamship Company and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Bartel et al v. A-C Product Liability Trust et al
as 1:2009cv02208
Plaintiff:
Willard E. Bartel, Willard E. Bartel, David C. Peebles and others
Defendant:
A-C Product Liability Trust, Acorn Iron & Supply Co., Alaska Steamship Company and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Jandreau v. Alfa Laval USA, Inc.,et al.,
as 5:2009cv00174
Plaintiff:
Erness H Jandreau
Defendant:
Alfa Laval USA, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, Inc., A. W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Ginez v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
Andres Ginez, Andres Ginez and Andres Ginez
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Amcord, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Ginez v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 4:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
Andres Ginez, Andres Ginez and Andres Ginez
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Amcord, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
