Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Al Ghrairi v. Federal-Mogul Motorparts LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff: Sahar Al Ghrairi
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Motorparts LLC, Federal-Mogul Products, Inc., Icahn Automotive Group LLC d/b/a The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe and Jack Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pizarro et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08427
Defendant: York International Corp., individually and as successor in interest to Lillard Co. and Lilco, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Plaintiff: Renato C Pizarro, Mercedita D Pizarro and Mercedita D. Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WIllie McNeal, Jr. v. Autozone, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv03415
Defendant: Autozone West, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Shulton Inc. and others
Plaintiff: WIllie McNeal, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ki Ho Yang et al v. Plasti Dip International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv09999
Defendant: The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California, The Sherwin-Williams Manufacturing Company, Plasti Dip International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ki Ho Yang, Ko Eun Oh and Keith Yang
Cross Defendant: Valspar Specialty Paints, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company
as 4:2016cv01063
Defendant: Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Pep Boys-Manny Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc
Plaintiff: Gerardo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee: AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant: LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant: CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant: ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant: BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant: PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lucci et al v. Baja Motorsports, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv20155
Plaintiff: Michael Lucci
Defendant: Baja Motorsports, Inc. and The Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ridgedell et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv04577
Defendant: Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Plaintiff: Lyle Ridgedell and Mary Ridgedell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?