Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11076
Plaintiff:
TAPRICIA T. BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18366
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER T BAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv86181
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06497
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE T BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06491
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT T BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58276
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT T BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58287
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE T BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv23324
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Baker and Randy T. Baker
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv12649
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Baker and Randy T. Baker
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv31865
Plaintiff:
Ruby T. Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
