Cases 31 - 40 of 5,167
CASE ENTERED IN ERROR: DUPLICATE CASE OF 22-cv-1825 JNE/DTS Giles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Timothy Giles and Lydia Wilson
Defendant:
3M Company, Ethicon Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sheila Rivera
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Noblet v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Tanner Noblet
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Kephart v. Torax Medical, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Juleen Kephart
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Poyle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Brian Poyle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Banks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sousa v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Garry Sousa
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc, Davol, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richmond-Prohaska v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
DEBRA RICHMOND-PROHASKA
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Paletta v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Dawn Paletta
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Black-Slattery v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Karen Black-Slattery
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
