Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,837
Mary Ramos v Anco Insulations, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv01208
Undetermined: Central Gulf Towing LLC, The McCarty Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Defendant: Edward L. Diefenthal, Grefco, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant: Ramon Ramos, Sr., Hacienda Construction, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mary Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MARMONTELLO et al v. AMERICAN BILTRITE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00462
Defendant: GARDNER DENVER, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MAGID GLOVE AND SAFETY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LLC and others
Plaintiff: JOAN MARMONTELLO and CHARLES MARMONTELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Viale et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00038
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER LLC, Grinnell LLC, Elementis Chemicals Inc and others
Plaintiff: Debbie L. Viale and Amber Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Minassian et al v. Brenntag North America et al
as 1:2018cv09708
Petitioner: Whitaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to AMerican Talc Company, Inc., Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc. and Resource Processors, Inc.
Defendant: Imerys Talc America, Inc., Brenntag Specialties Inc. as a successor-in-interest to Mineral Pigment Solutions, Inc., as as successor-in-interest to Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc., Brenntag North America and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Minassian and Donald Minassian
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., as successor-in-interest to American Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc., Charles Mathieu, Inc, and Resource Processors, Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Windsor Minerals, Inc., JOHN DOE 1 through JOHN DOE 75 (fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv00477
Plaintiff: Janis Flowers , James Flowers and Gerald Flowers, Jr.
Defendant: 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc., Aurora Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant: Aurora Pump Company , Honeywell International, Inc. , Dap Products Inc. and others
Cross_defendant: Aurora Pump Company , 3M Company, Armstrong Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James G. Burney, et al v. A-C Product Liability Trust, et al
as 16-3392
: In re: NORTHERN OHIO MARITIME ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEBBLES
Plaintiff: JAMES G. BURNEY and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Defendant - Appellee: SOCONY MOBIL OIL CO., MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION and others
Shaw v. Andritz Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00725
Plaintiff: Ralph Elliott Shaw and Joan Sanderson Shaw
Defendant: Andritz Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated, Bay Valley Pulp and Paper Company and others
Cross_claimant: Gardner Denver Inc.
Cross_defendant: Gardner Denver Inc., Andritz Inc., Baker Hughes Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Handy, et al v. Owens Corning Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00755
Plaintiff: Thomas Handy, Jr. , Sandra Handy and Thomas Handy, III
Defendant: Owens-Illinois, Inc., Viacom, Inc., Foster-Wheeler, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Marquez v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03789
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Marquez
John B. Fish et al v 3M Company et al
as 2:2014cv02999
Defendant: 3M Company, A.H. Voss Company, Asbestos Corporation Limited and others
Plaintiff: Hilda Fish and John B Fish

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?