Cases 21 - 30 of 270
Mary Ramos v Anco Insulations, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv01208
Undetermined:
Central Gulf Towing LLC, The McCarty Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Defendant:
Edward L. Diefenthal, Grefco, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ramon Ramos, Sr., Hacienda Construction, Inc., Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCOTT et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00335
Defendant:
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KATE SPADE & COMPANY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON SCOTT and MICHAEL SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silverman et al v. Brenntag North America et al
as 1:2018cv08495
Defendant:
Imerys USA, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Health and Wellness Solutions Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harriet Silverman and Kenneth Silverman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Bourg v. Anco Insulations Inc et al
as 2:2018cv04188
Defendant:
Anco Insulations Inc , A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bourg, Sr.
Third_party_defendant:
CBS Corporation , Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Eagle Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Atwood & Morrill , Grefco, Inc. and Viking Pump, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodrigue v. Anco Insulation, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
Theresa Rodrigue
Defendant:
Anco Insulation, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Third_party_defendant:
Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, Uniroyal, Inc. and Uniroyal Holding, Inc.
Third_party_plaintiff:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
Anco Insulation, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Maxine Pelker v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 18-35114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAXINE PELKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rex D. Pelker, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation
Donohue et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv07232
Defendant:
CBS Corporation , ABB, Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael B Donohue and Anne Donohue
Debtor:
Viking Pump Inc. and The City Of New York
Cross_claimant:
Flowserve US Inc. , Crane Co. and Carrier Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Flowserve US Inc. , ABB, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melissa Coury v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 17-35492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELISSA COURY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Coury
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; sued individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CH MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC., an Oregon corporation, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, a New York corporation and others
Wegenaar v. City of New York
as 1:2016cv06049
Defendant:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Brian Wegenaar
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Hanson, Individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Delmont D. Hanson, deceased and Tony Hanson v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hanson, Individually, and as Executrix of the Estate of Delmont D. Hanson, deceased and Tony Hanson
Defendant:
3M Company, American Biltrite, Inc. A Delaware Corporation, Cyprus-Amax Minerals Co., successor to Sierra Talc Co & United Talc Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
