Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff: Robert J Gillis
Defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant: Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party: Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court: Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Fern Barker et al v. AGCO Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv06239
Defendant: Carlisle Process Systems, Inc., Honeywell International, INCL, General Motors Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Fern Barker, Carmen Barker, Tamara Worthen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JANDREAU v. AC DELCO et al
as 2:2009cv70654
Plaintiff: HARVEY JANDREAU
Defendant: AC DELCO, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARVIN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
CHRISTENSON et al v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv73869
Plaintiff: EARL G CHRISTENSON and ELIZABETH CHRISTENSON
Defendant: A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD IND, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LONGORIA v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2007cv73868
Plaintiff: MARY LONGORIA
Defendant: A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOWARD et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62862
Plaintiff: JAMES HOWARD, JAMES HOWARD, DONALD L. PAINTER and others
Defendant: AC&S, INC., A & I COMPANY, INC., A & I COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?