Cases 151 - 160 of 199
Held v. Lee et al
as 2:2014cv01629
Defendant:
Peter Lee and California Health Benefit Exchange
Plaintiff:
Kristin Held
Intervenor:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
O'Connell v. Regents of the University of California
as 3:2014cv02880
Plaintiff:
Michael O'Connell
Miscellaneou:
United States of America
Defendant:
Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02477
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Darryl M Jones v. DB Structure Products, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03979
Defendant:
DB Structure Products, Inc, Does, Fidelity National Title Company and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl M. Jones
United States of America v. Reunion Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv02340
Defendant:
David Thayer, Reunion Mortgage, Inc. and R. Kent Harvey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Roe v. Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, et al
as 2:2014cv00917
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, Reno Orthopedic Clinic, Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sprint Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint PCS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Phan v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
Irving Phan
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Intervenor_plaintiff:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rinehart et al v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
Debbie G. Rinehart
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America and State of California
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Oscar Johnson v. Board of Supervisor
as 2:2014cv00387
Defendant:
Board of Supervisor
Plaintiff:
Oscar Johnson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
