Cases 171 - 180 of 182
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05108
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 132 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
MORGAN v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05097
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MORGAN
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv05021
Plaintiff:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04659
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 25 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Movant:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04642
Plaintiff:
LOCAL 274 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., LUPIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp et al
as 3:2013cv03583
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp, IMPAX Laboratories, Inc. , Lupin Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04270
Plaintiff:
ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. , LUPIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04235
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. , LUPIN LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Defendant:
ALPHA THERAPEUTIC CO, BAXTER HEMOGLOBIN THERAPEUTICS, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF IOWA, COUNTY OF GREENE, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Interested Party:
OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, LLC, EXCELLUS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, KLINE & SPECTER, PC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHARMACIA CORPORATION, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., KREMERS URBAN DEV. CO. and others
Not Classified By Court:
M. JOYCE HOWE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CORINNA CONNICK
Plaintiff:
THERESE SHEPLEY, LARRY YOUNG and STATE OF VA
Mylan Inc. et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH et al
as 1:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Mylan Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
