Antitrust Cases filed in California
Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Nerddeer, LLC et al v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2019cv06884
Defendant: Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Does 01 through 50, inclusive, The Entity and Issuer and others
Plaintiff: David Scott Bayer, II, David Scott Bayer, II, LLC and Nerddeer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv03142
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Janssen R&D Ireland and others
Plaintiff: Teamsters Local 237 Retirees' Benefit Fund and Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Snipe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv02734
Plaintiff: Michael Snipe, Josh McDonald, Gabriel Molina and others
Defendant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Gilead Sciences, LLC, Janssen R&D Ireland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III)
as 3:2017md02801
Defendant: Capacitors Antitrust Litigation (No.III), Panasonic Corporation, KEMET Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Chip-Tech, Ltd., Michael Brooks, Benchmark Electronics Phoenix Incorporated and others
Respondent: Cisco Systems, Inc. and Aptiv Services US, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Petitioner: Quathimatine Holdings, Inc., HP, Inc. and Dell Inc.
Claimant: Certain Members of Direct Purchaser Plaintiff Settlement Class
Interested Party: Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Caldwell et al v. BMW North America, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv06052
Plaintiff: Robert E. Caldwell , Tracy Childress , Saad Ehtisham and others
Defendant: BMW North America, LLC, BMW AG, Audi AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02796
Defendant: : German Automotive Manufacturers Antitrust Litigation, Audi of America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Plaintiff: Gabriel Briscoe, Marilyn Fong, Travis Burton and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robert B. Kinkade
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Damske et al v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00019
Plaintiff: Debra L. Damske , Ken Dunlap , John Peychal and others
Defendant: Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Starkist Company , Tri-Union Seafoods LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Waterman v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00022
Plaintiff: Amy E Waterman
Defendant: Bumble Bee Foods LLC, Starkist Company , Tri-Union Seafoods LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02787
Defendant: Tri-Union Seafoods LLC, King Oscar, Inc., Bumble Bee Foods LLC and others
Plaintiff: Affiliated Foods, Inc.
Petitioner: Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co., Inc. , Central Grocers, Inc. , Associated Grocers of Florida, Inc. and others
Movant: Associated Grocers of New England, Inc. , North Central Distributors, LLC , Cash-Wa Distributing Co. of Kearney, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?