Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 79
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-2413
Plaintiff: FTC Capital GMBH, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Courtyard at Amwell II, LLC, Greenwich Commons II, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: California Public Plaintiffs, San Diego Association of Governments, City of Richmond and others
Defendant - Appellee: Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and others
Defendant: Rabobank Group, Credit Suisse Group, NA, Societe Generale and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv04109
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 17-1915
Plaintiff: FTC Futures Fund PCC Ltd, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Carpenters Pension Fund of West Virginia, City of Dania Beach Police & Firefighters' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: City of New Britain, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Vistra Energy Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: Lloyds Banking Group plc, Bank of America Corporation, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Defendant: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Bank of Nova Scotia and others
In Re: Libor-Based Financial We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1569
Plaintiff: Carpenters Pension Fund of West Virginia, City of Dania Beach Police & Firefighters' Retirement System, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Ravan Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Schwab Short-Term Bond Market Fund, Schwab Total Bond Market Fund, Schwab U.S. Dollar Liquid Assets Fund and others
Defendant - Appellee: Lloyds Banking Group plc, Bank of America Corporation, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and others
Defendant: Credit Agricole S.A., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, BNP Paribas S.A. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15902
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellee: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA, LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Methodist Health Services Corp v. OSF Healthcare System We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3791
Plaintiff - Appellant: METHODIST HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee: OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, dba SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER
Mahoney v. Federal Reserve Assocation et al
as 2:2016cv01599
Plaintiff: John Francis Mahoney
Defendant: Federal Reserve Assocation, Humana Hospital West Anaheim, Saint Jude Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rozelle, Jr. et al v. Lowe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00489
Defendant: Patrick H. Autry, Branscomb PC, Broadway National Bank and others
Plaintiff: Clarita Sommers Johnson and Francis McQueen Rozelle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Chandan Vora v. Don Michaels, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-4571
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHANDAN S. VORA
Defendant - Appellee: DON MICHAELS, J. WHITE, CRAIG FOUST and others
Debtor - Appellee: E. SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?