Antitrust Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 75
The State of Nevada by its Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto v. Renown Health We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00409
Defendant: Renown Health
Plaintiff: The State of Nevada by its Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 12-1067
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
: COUNTY OF ORANGE, ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF VA, LARRY YOUNG and THERESE SHEPLEY
Movant - Appellant: CORINNA CONNICK
Defendant - Appellee: BAXTER PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., STANLEY C. HOPKINS, MONSANTO COMPANY and others
Defendant: AGOURON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BIOGEN, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC and others
Interested Party - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY AND FINANCING, HUMANA, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC. and others
Interested Party: MILBERG LLP, PARMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and others
State of Florida et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv06205
Plaintiff: State of Florida , Office of the Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc., LG Eletronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., Ltd. and others
Pecial_master: Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
State of Florida et al v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06205
Plaintiff: State of Florida , Office of the Attorney General and Department of Legal Affairs
Defendant: LG Electronics, Inc., LG Eletronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Cheeks of North America, Inc. v. Fort Myer Construction Corp., et al
as 11-7117
Plaintiff - Appellant: Cheeks of North America, Inc., CNA
Defendant - Appellee: Fort Myer Construction Corporation, Francisco Rodrigues Neto, Jose Rodrigues and others
Washington State, et al v. Chimei Innolux Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant - Appellant: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. and others
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the U.S., et al
as 11-20381
Plaintiff - Appellant: CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
Sonintel Sociedade National v. Attorney General of the US, et al
as 10-20558
Plaintiff - Appellant: CECIL ROUTIE
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T, INC., EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., Chairman & Cheif Executive Officer and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical Industry
as 10-1959
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 537 TRUST FUNDS, BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS and SHEET METAL WORKERS UNION NATIONAL HEALTH FUND
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Appellant: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv03517
Plaintiff: State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs
Defendant: AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chimei Innolux Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?