Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cendejas v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC et al
as 3:2021cv03447
Defendant:
Sony Group Corporation and Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Plaintiff:
Adrian Cendejas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Caccuri v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
as 3:2021cv03361
Plaintiff:
Agustin Caccuri
Defendant:
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Petitioner:
Adrian Cendejas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Frame-Wilson et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2020cv00424
Plaintiff:
Christian Sabol, Deborah Frame-Wilson, Gail Murphy and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Esteban v. Qualcomm Inc.
as 5:2017cv00622
Defendant:
Qualcomm Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adrian Esteban
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
National Hockey League et al v. National Hockey League Players' Association et al
as 1:2012cv09133
Plaintiff:
National Hockey League , Anaheim Ducks Hockey Club, L.L.C. , Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. and others
Defendant:
National Hockey League Players' Association , Craig Adams , Adrian Aucoin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv01746
Plaintiff:
CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO, JOSE RODRIGUES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC et al
as 0:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
Adriane Daniels, Adriane Daniels, Adriane Daniels and others
Defendant:
Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC, Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC, Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC and others
Carter v. President of the USA, et al
as 09-7064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT OF THE USA, STOCKHOLDERS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
