Antitrust Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al v. KROGER CO. et al
as 1:2022cv03357
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Defendant: KROGER CO. and ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. DRAFTKINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant: DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. AETNA INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01494
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF DELAWARE , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant: AETNA INC. and HUMANA INC.
Pecial_master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ANTHEM, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01493
Defendant: ANTHEM, INC, CIGNA CORP. and ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Petitioner: KAISER PERMANENTE HEALTH PLAN, INC., TUFTS ASSOCIATED HEALTH PLANS, INC., MERCER and others
Special Master: RICHARD A. LEVIE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. STAPLES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02115
Petitioner: DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER, RENT-A-CENTER, INC., GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: OFFICE DEPOT, INC. and STAPLES, INC.
Interested Party: JOHN DOE, LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM and others
Plaintiff: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intervenor: JOHN DOE CORPORATION III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant: SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party: DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner: XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae: PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor: REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
CHEEKS et al v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00914
Defendant: FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , FRANCISCO RODRIGUES NETO and others
Plaintiff: JOHN C. CHEEKS , CHEEKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. and ONE OR MORE PLAINTIFFS WHO WERE DAMAGED IN THEIR BUSINESS OR PROPERTY BY THE UNLAWFUL TORTIOUS ACTS OF DEFENDANTS HEREIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?