Cases 1 - 10 of 31
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Auction Houses Anti., et al v. , et al
as 1:2000cv00648
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robert A. Daly, Jr., Ronald Black, Vicki Haberman and others
Claimant:
N.B.S. Diamonds, Inc., Seymour Stein, Louis Glick Diamond Corp. d/b/a Louis Glick & Co. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Sotheby's Inc., Christopher M. Davidge, Abraham & Associates and others
Defendant:
Fataihi Company of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, A. Alfred Taubman, Swicorp, S.A. and others
Interested Party:
United States Of America and The United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
J&J Lubrano, Giovanna Terruzzi, Pamela Alper and others
Petitioner:
Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.
Plaintiff:
Herbert Black
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Stephanie Turner v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHANIE TURNER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO and others
McDonald's Corporation v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McDonald's Corporation v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07182
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Food Group, LLC, The Clemens Family Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Leinani Deslandes v. McDonald's USA LLC, et al
as 22-2333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEINANI DESLANDES
Defendant / Appellee:
MCDONALD'S USA LLC, MCDONALD'S CORPORATION and DOES 1-10
Deslandes v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04857
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, McDonald's Coporation and McDonald's USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leinani Deslandes
Respondent:
ADP, Inc. and Paychex, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
McDonald's Corporation v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv04354
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Koch Foods, Inc., JCG Foods Of Alabama, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2016cv03711
Plaintiff:
Boston Retirement System, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A, Gary McDonald, BNP Paribas and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100 and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
The Police Retirement System of St. Louis, City of Atlanta Firefighters Pension Fund, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Turner v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05524
Defendant:
McDonald's USA, LLC and McDonald's Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Turner
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
