Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Somerset Party Store Inc. v Juul, Inc, et al
as 3:2020cv04073
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC and Altria Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Somerset Party Store Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2020cv03131
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Bogard Construction, Inc., Vincent Cendejas and others
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Craig Kelly, Carpe Carma, LLC, Marie E. Richardson and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California, All Parties, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff:
Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae:
HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent:
State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party:
Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2017md02773
Defendant:
Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation and Qualcomm Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hart, All Plaintiffs, Michelle Mackay and others
Not Classified By Court:
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd, SYNNEX Corporation, Best Buy Co., Inc. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Jennifer Milici
Interested Party:
Huawei Device U.S.A. Inc., Sequans Communications, Inc. and Avanci LLC
Petitioner:
NVIDIA Corporation and InterDigital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: PACKAGED SEAFOOD PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2015md02670
Plaintiff:
Truyen Ton-Vuong, Steven Kratky, Melissa Bowman and others
Defendant:
Big Catch Cayman LP, Dongwon Enterprises Co. Ltd., Chicken of the Sea International, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lion Capital LLP and Christopher Lischewski
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Affiliated Foods Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shames et al v. The Hertz Corporation
as 2:2009at00713
Plaintiff:
Michael Shames and Gary Gromkow
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation and Non-party respondent
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant:
Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified:
Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party:
James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master:
Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Robin McEntee
In Re:
Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other:
Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
