Cases 11 - 20 of 434
Das et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv11091
Plaintiff:
Ajit Das and Rime Das
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef Electronic Fund Transfer Act
McMorris v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv03025
Plaintiff:
Jason McMorris
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Block Inc. doing business as Cash App
Hatch v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
as 5:2023cv06717
Plaintiff:
Bradford Hatch
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Tang v. First Republic Bank et al
as 3:2023cv06607
Plaintiff:
Gloria Tang
Defendant:
First Republic Bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for First Republic Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dalrymple v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv04529
Plaintiff:
Deidra Dalrymple
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Gould v. JP Morgan Chase & Co et al
as 1:2023cv08413
Plaintiff:
Sherry Gould
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2023cv15609
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Barker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AGL FREIGHT & LOGISTICS LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 1:2023cv23674
Plaintiff:
AGL FREIGHT & LOGISTICS LLC
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Reybol v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv05546
Plaintiff:
Arcelio Joseph Reybol
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diamond v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 2:2023cv12464
Plaintiff:
Earl Diamond
Defendant:
Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Bank, Riverbend Apartments, Charger Properties and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
