Cases 91 - 100 of 344
KingLew Investments, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
John W. Moncus, Jr., United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development, Debra Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
KingLew Investments, Inc. and Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cragun et al v. Merrill
as 2:2020cv01517
Plaintiff:
Chris Nelson, Robert Corker, Heather Coleman and others
Defendant:
John H Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Early v. Gardendale, City of et al
as 2:2020cv01368
Defendant:
Dispatcher Vicki, Dispatcher Lisa, Gardendale, City of and others
Plaintiff:
John Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose v. Coley et al
as 3:2020cv00713
Defendant:
Ruthie Carpenter, Kenneth Barnes, Tommy Pugh and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. DHR et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
DHR, Julius Williams, John William and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullen v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv00095
Defendant:
David Barnett, Mobile Bar Association, JoJo Schwarzauer and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Arthur Sullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Safford et al
as 3:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Dr. Jimmy D. Shaw, Jr., Kelly Services Global LLC, Florence City Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Differ v. Diveley et al
as 2:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Ms Kathleen R Dively, Ms Michelle Robinson and Kathleen R Diveley
Plaintiff:
Dennis John Differ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lachapelle v. Jernigan et al
as 5:2019cv02121
Defendant:
Avery Murpheree Morris, Drandy King, Benji Stolz and others
Plaintiff:
Aja Marie Lachapelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Snelson et al
as 2:2019cv01994
Defendant:
Officer Speaks, Officer Phillips, Officer Snelson and others
Plaintiff:
John King, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
