Cases 91 - 100 of 1,478
Howe v. Bryson
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Natasha Howe
Defendant:
Kent Bryson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of West Virginia v. Jones
as 1:2023cv00042
In Re:
T.J., Aa. J., A.J. and others
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Emmanuel Jones
Interested Party:
Shaquayla Jones and Tamra Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hi-Lad, Inc. v. Colombo et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Colombo, Robert F. Tebay, David Blaire (sic) Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Princeton, West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Franklin Long, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Princeton, West Virginia, Tim Gray and Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coss v. Teters et al
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
James A. Coss, Jr.
Defendant:
David Teters, Tyler Teters, Connor Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knotts v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Defendant:
Keith White and Honorable Thomas A. Bedell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abruzzino v. Amick et al
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Abruzzino
Defendant:
Drew Amick and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Kandi Wood
Defendant:
Jason Johnson and Marshall County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. W. V. Department of Health and Human Resources
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Inca Miller and William Miller
Defendant:
WV Department Health Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jan King and Kimberly Maynard
Defendant:
Phyllis Smith, Scott Caserta, Samantha McCollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
