Cases 101 - 110 of 4,862
Jackson v. Liedkie
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lynn L Jackson
Defendant:
Curtis L Liedkie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Annu El v. Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic
as 2:2023cv02007
Plaintiff:
Zebelum Anna El, Zebelum Willis and Zebelum Annu El
Defendant:
Sea Mar Kent Medical Clinic and Sandy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brabrook v. CDM Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Caroline Brabrook
Defendant:
CDM Smith, Douglas Lavoie, Daniel Manojlovski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Mikanda v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Neyembo Mikanda
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Clark County et al
as 3:2024cv05123
Plaintiff:
Stacy Bowen
Defendant:
Clark County, Grant Hagen, Austin Cloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Chase Banks
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Nikie M King
Defendant:
Chase Banks
Cross Defendant:
Stein Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy et al v. Basden et al
as 3:2024cv05075
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Brent Basden, Alex Schodowski, Dave Neupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Luis Andre Perez
Defendant:
State of Washington, Spokane County, City of Airway Heights and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eier v. Aukerman et al
as 4:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Theresa Eier
Defendant:
Laura Aukerman and City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
