Cases 111 - 120 of 5,345
Wills v. Weaver Police Department, The et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Tacarius Willis and Tacarius Wills
Defendant:
Weaver Police Department, The, Nicholas Quinn, Calhoun County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boykin v. US Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Boykin
Defendant:
US Postal Service and Jarvis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Knox et al
as 7:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Aline H Williams
Defendant:
Jessie Knox, Deb Knox, Franderick Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamby v. Phoenix Millworks Distributors Inc
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
James Hamby
Defendant:
Phoenix Millworks Distributors Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Roderick Harris
Defendant:
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, Crawford & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wills v. Howard et al
as 7:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Damien Wills
Defendant:
C Howard, TD Brown, T Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tyler Collins
Defendant:
Larry Hatfield and Matt Spradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. Lowndes County Sheriff Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Office and Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Shandra Morris
Defendant:
Officer Ross, Officer Perry, Chad Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
