Cases 151 - 160 of 7,178
SOWDERS v. BYRNE et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
BARRY JUNIOR SANDERS and BARRY JUNIOR SOWDERS
Defendant:
ANDY BURNE, MIKE ISOM, KELLY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. AutoZone Stores LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael D Hill
Defendant:
AutoZone Stores LLC and Natasha Lefevra
Other:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Catalano v. Starke County of
as 3:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Catalano
Defendant:
The County of Starke Indiana and Starke County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Handshoe v. Northeastern Center et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Almond Dale Handshoe
Defendant:
Northeastern Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Miami Correctional Facility
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Donald Bradley
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility doing business as Indiana Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Winder v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Urica Winder
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Jason Fuhrman, Shannon Hughes and others
Other:
Samuel Ardery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Appleton v. Dodson et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ebony Appleton
Defendant:
Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv02293
Plaintiff:
DALE C. TRANBARGER
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
Jones v. Wolcott Police Department
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Wolcott Police Department and Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2023cv00440
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Kimberly O'Connor, Kimberly Cox, Oscar Martinez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
